Charles Bukowski’s Top 10 Tips For Living A Kick-Ass Life
“I carry death in my left pocket. Sometimes I take it out and talk to it: “Hello, baby, how you doing? When you coming for me? I’ll be ready.”
Negative Capability: Kerouac's Buddhist Ethic
50 Unexplainable Black & White Photos
Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts
Friday, August 22, 2014
Headlines of the Week (Or Whatever)
Labels:
american psycho,
bateman,
buddism,
bukowski,
kerouac,
life,
philosophy,
photo
Friday, March 29, 2013
Physics & Philosophy
From my weekly comments for Honors Colloquium:
"I
like to think the moon is there even if I am not looking at it." ~Albert
Einstein
In Newtonian physics, our
world is orderly. Everything that happens is pre-ordained and with enough
information, intrinsically predictable. Our scientific ideas of the
time well-matched our religious ideas at the time, with human beings at the
center of the earth, which was at the center of the universe, over which we
could, given enough time and effort, completely control. This strikes me as
reminiscent of our desire to embrace a fundamental reality in nature, which may
or may not be known as God.
In quantum mechanics, our
world is uncertain. Everything exists in a cloud of possibilities. Precise
definitions are unobtainable, and as Sir Isaac Newton came to show us, even
things we thought we understood had an even deeper level. Light is one such
example; what we once thought of as particles turned out to be both particles
and waves. With a sigh, we have alternately accepted and fought the uncertain
duality of the universe ever since.
Labels:
duality,
galileo,
god,
light,
newton,
particle,
philosophy,
physics,
quantum mechanics,
religion,
wave
Monday, March 25, 2013
On Philosophy
From my Honors Colloquium II mid-term exam, part 2:
1. In his
key piece, Critique of Pure Reason,
Immanuel Kant posits the idea that all human knowledge falls into two
categories: a priori, meaning 'from
before', and a posteriori, meaning
'from later'. A priori knowledge is gained independently from experience, is
obvious, and requires no real effort to discern. A posteriori knowledge, on the
contrary, is gained by experience or empirical evidence. Kant then categorizes
our ability to know into two categories: noumena,
which are things that can be perceived empirically, and phenomena, which can be discerned only through intuition. 'Real'
things, or noumena, are merely representations of unknowns, or phenomena, which
are interpreted through our a priori or a posteriori knowledge to reach an
understanding, inasmuch as we can understand the universe.
Labels:
cameron,
colloquium,
confucius,
cu,
emerson,
ethics,
hobbes,
Jesus,
kant,
kierkegaard,
locke,
morals,
nietzsche,
philosophy,
quantum,
relative,
rousseau,
sartre,
siddhartha,
universal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)